Precedent vs. Contemporaneous Autonomy in Regard to Advance Directives Essay

Precedent vs. Contemporaneous Autonomy in Regard to Advance Directives - Essay ExampleRonald Dworkin argues that if we lot declare this patient incompetent, he does not have the capacity that autonomy represents. This means that respect should be upheld to the patients prior beseeches made when competent. This is because a competent individuals decisions are autonomous ones. This view is referred to as the integrity view, which states that the value of autonomy derives from the capacity it protects the capacity to express ones own lineament traits, values, commitments, convictions and critical as well as experiential interest in a liveliness one leads. However, it is arguable that, in most cases the present desires expressed by a patient need to be respected. Dworkin constructs a hypothetical case, where there exists a woman named Margo, who has dementia, but still seems to find pleasure in seemingly meaningless activities, such as reading, eating snacks among others. He even e xplains that Margo may be one of the happiest people he knows. However, years back, Margo had signed an toss away directive expressing her desire to be left to die if she were to need life-saving medical treatment once afflicted with dementia. ... Dworkin believes we must respect Margos advance directive, as Margo living with dementia is her living against her critical interests that she held while competent. Experiential interests, in my opinion, hold a great deal of value, enough that experiential interests alone run one worthful and thus their life worth continuing. As Dworkin points out, pleasures that experiential interests provide are essential for a good life. A good life has value in it of itself, and while genuine meaning and coherence may enhance this value, no requirement for value to be obtained (Marshall, 123). I deduce that the causation we have critical interests are so we can enhance individual experiential ones. For instance, Dworkin claims establishing close fri endships are an example of a critical interest. The reason we wish to establish such relationships is so when watching football, or seeing Casablanca for the twelfth time or walking in the woods in October (Marshall, 51) we are that such(prenominal) happier and life is more enjoyable. However, if one performs these experiential interests without having formed close relationships, they do not suddenly lack value they are just perhaps meagrely less enjoyable. However, if one were still to argue on critical interests that hold true value, we can see in many instances where experiential interests remain valuable on their own. The existence of a person who is solely able to attain experiential interests may allow someone else to enhance his or her critical interests. For example, in the case of Margo, there existed a medical student, Firlik, who took a specific interest in her case (Marshall, 144). By being able to visit Margo daily, Firlik was able to serve his questions and